safe
node run-baby-fleming --ip my.ip.v6.address
files put /home/folaht/safe/bonjour_chacun.txt
cat safe://source_path
Expectations
A Bonjour chacun ! on server.
Results
Server
[2021-02-02T22:20:04Z ERROR quinn::builders] I/O error: Address family not supported by protocol (os error 97)
[2021-02-02T22:20:04Z ERROR qp2p::api] Failed to bootstrap to the network: Connection lost
[2021-02-02T22:20:04Z ERROR quinn::builders] I/O error: Address family not supported by protocol (os error 97)
[2021-02-02T22:20:04Z ERROR qp2p::api] Failed to bootstrap to the network: Connection lost
[2021-02-02T22:20:04Z ERROR quinn::builders] I/O error: Address family not supported by protocol (os error 97)
[2021-02-02T22:20:04Z ERROR qp2p::api] Failed to bootstrap to the network: Connection lost
[2021-02-02T22:20:04Z ERROR safe] sn_cli error: Failed to connect: [Error] ConnectionError - Failed to connect to the SAFE Network: QuicP2p(BootstrapFailure)
We have not enabled ipv6 yet. Our goal is stability first and ip6 is great but alas and I mean alas not widely enough used yet. Enabling it would prevent many people from running a node. Running in parallel means doubling the numbers of endpoints in use so there is a cost and a significant one for many people.
tl;dr The ipv6 story needs work, the world needs to move to ipv6 and Safe needs to handle it, just not yet though, not yet