[Solved] Potential bug in routing table

I didn’t have time to use TEST 12 network, but I studied a log provided by a community member and I find something strange:

Node(454225..) Node approval completed. Prefixes: {Prefix(00), Prefix(01), Prefix(11)}

The missing prefix is 10 and in my opinion it should have been 01 per node name 454225. It may be due to original name being 90beb9 which corresponds to 10 prefix. And thinking further there should have been no missing prefixes at all because our_prefix is also part of the result.

I am sorry in advance if this is a false alarm.

Edit: I think now this is ok because a node only knows its neighbouring sections and prefix 10 differs by 2 bits and so is not the prefix of a neighbouring section. Sorry for that.